Dispute Resolution Methods in Quantity Surveying

Become a certified Quantity Surveyor! Enroll Here!

Types of Disputes in Quantity Surveying

Disputes are common in quantitative research because of its complexity, the different interests of stakeholders, and the potential for misunderstanding or misunderstanding. Quantity surveyors play a key role in resolving these disputes by providing a financial and contractual lens through which conflicts can be analyzed and resolved. By focusing on the technical, legal and financial aspects of construction contracts, they help mediate between the parties and achieve a fair resolution. In this blog we will explore the key methods and approaches quantity surveyors use to resolve disputes and ensure projects stay on track.

Common Causes of Disputes in Quantity Surveying

Disputes in Quantitative Surveying projects often arise due to a number of issues, including:

Contractual Misunderstandings: Different interpretations of contractual terms can lead to disagreements between the parties.

Cost Overruns: Unexpected expenses can cause disputes, especially if one party believes they are not responsible for the additional costs.

Project Delays: Delays in project completion can lead to liability and compensation disputes..

Design Variations: Changes in the scope of a project or design can lead to disagreements over cost and how these changes should be contractually addressed.

Payment Disputes: Disputes can arise when contractors believe they are not being paid according to agreed terms or when the client feels the work is of poor quality.

Quantity Surveyors are tasked with managing and mitigating these disputes through proactive contract management, clear communication and accurate cost control.

Common Dispute Resolution Methods in Quantity Surveying

All parties will want to avoid dispute resolution, especially if they defend their actions. As a result, construction companies must invest in multiple ways to successfully manage variables to ensure all bases are covered. While this helps reduce disputes, businesses may not always be able to avoid them. This is why simple tasks such as ensuring that payments are sent, filling out invoices and completing receipts are some of the most important stages for companies. With different systems, this could be an easy reason for someone to start a dispute. Using construction project management software as a tool ensures these phases are completed while ensuring an auditable trail is left behind.

1. Adjudication

Decision-making makes it possible to resolve disputes based on a construction contract quickly, efficiently and economically in the interim. This solution is ideal if you need to address claims related to delays, disruptions and payments. For businesses looking to avoid this process entirely, implementing Quantity Surveying project management software mitigates the risks of late payments for suppliers and allows businesses to maintain a clear paper trail.

Pros of Adjudication

• It is designed to protect the cash flows of construction projects while there is a dispute.
• This process will avoid expensive court hearings and other legal expenses if done correctly.
• It’s a quick process, which makes it more attractive to businesses trying to resolve a claim.
• Decision making can be left between the relevant parties without the need for the information to go directly into the public eye.

Cons of Adjudication

• Decision making is a fast process that can sometimes work against construction companies, especially if there is a lack of evidence in the solution.
• Making a counterclaim can be difficult, especially if you believe the arbitrator’s decision is unfair or unreasonable.
• Starting a trial without the relevant evidence or paper trail to hand immediately penalizes the defendant.
• Resolving issues internally and through an arbitrator could lead to bias, even if unconscious.

2. Expert Determination

This resolution process involves an independent expert who reviews the claim and supporting evidence and makes a decision based on technical factors, not legal ones. For those who want to avoid expensive costs, it can be an ideal solution.

Pros of Expert Determination

• This process is efficient because it finds solutions without the costs of court or formal proceedings.
• Expert judgment is ideal for settling disputes focused on valuation or technical factors.

Cons of Expert Determination

• Expert judgment should not be used where there are legal issues or disputes such as delays, damage or defective work.
• Any decisions made by independent experts, especially if they are considered binding, are difficult to overturn. This also applies if the independent expert made a mistake.

3. Litigation

Litigation is the process of legal action regarding an unresolved dispute. This can prove incredibly expensive for construction companies, but sometimes necessary, especially if no other dispute resolution methods are possible. In most cases, it can also ensure a fair trial for both sides with equal opportunities to present their case. To be best prepared for this stage, construction firms will need clear information and supporting evidence, which can be achieved with construction project information management software.

Pros of Litigation

• It allows both parties to fully and fairly share their arguments and present all necessary evidence to the court.
• Courts keep public records of cases and arguments, meaning that any decisions made cannot be challenged and offending parties will have to abide by the terms of the agreement.
• Litigation clearly presents information in a way that cannot be misinterpreted or altered in any way. It gives construction companies a definitive answer.

Cons of Litigation

• The biggest issue here is cost, especially since court costs and attorney fees aren’t the only ways you’ll pay. It could lead to delays in construction projects and, even worse, it could damage the company’s reputation if it is found to be at fault.
• Cases brought to court are not reviewed immediately, which means further disruption or delay. Cases can often take months to review and with the average UK dispute lasting around 11.8 months, it can be stressful to enter.
• Once the court proceedings begin, you may find yourself spending even more time trying to find a solution. Due to the complexity and nuances of each case, it is difficult to solve the problem in a day, let alone a few weeks.

Become a certified Quantity Surveyor! Enroll Here!

4. Mediation

Mediation is one of the most relaxing forms of dispute resolution because it is an informal and flexible process that allows both parties to make collective decisions and solutions. It gives all plaintiffs the power to present their case freely, while allowing defendants to follow evidenced arguments as well.

Pros of Mediation

• a process, it is strictly confidential. Both sides are easily able to present their arguments and claims without being in the public eye.
• Due to the nature of mediation, there is less pressure on both parties to settle and find an agreement.
• During mediation, no decisions or comments can reflect negatively on either party if they are later litigated.

Cons of Mediation

• Although this is a calmer environment, it can take much longer to reach an agreement or settlement, especially if both parties have sufficient supporting evidence. Mediation also does not guarantee resolution.
• Mediation can be the first stage of a dispute that leads to more costly or time-consuming dispute resolutions such as litigation.
• There is no guarantee that relations will be as they were before the dispute began, even if an agreement is reached soon. While mediation aims to improve the relationship between two parties, it can be damaged even after the dispute is resolved.

5. Arbitration

This form of dispute resolution is designed to be private, like mediation, but acts as a final solution when a claim arises. Arbitration is in the interest of many firms, especially since more public solutions such as litigation can damage a brand’s reputation and be expensive.

Pros of Arbitration

• Arbitration offers a cheaper dispute resolution option than litigation and is therefore much more attractive as a method.
• With fewer people involved in a lawsuit, arbitration can be much easier and smoother.
• As a private form of dispute resolution, arbitration can also be much more peaceful for both parties. It could even restore relations between plaintiffs and defendants.

Cons of Arbitration

• Bias is possible in arbitration, even if it is unconscious. Because they are not governed by the same rules as litigation, there may be cases where the decisions are considered unfair.
• Parties who do not believe their process was fair will not be able to appeal decisions made in arbitration.
• Arbitration does not follow a set process or have a standard of conduct, meaning that its approach can be inconsistent.

Since software and technology are known to streamline processes and ensure efficient control of everything, they can also be used as preventative measures in construction to reduce disputes.

How Quantity Surveyors Play a Role in Dispute Resolution

Quantity surveyors not only resolve disputes, but also play a preventive role in reducing the likelihood of conflicts arising. Some of their key strategies include:

Clear Contract Documentation

Quantity surveyors ensure that all contracts are clear, detailed and unambiguous. This includes:

• Clearly define the scope of the project to avoid misunderstandings.
• Including detailed provisions on options, payments and completion dates.
• Outlining procedures for resolving disputes if they arise.

A well-drafted contract helps reduce the likelihood of disputes by ensuring that all parties are aware of their obligations and expectations from the outset.

Accurate Cost Estimates

Cost disputes often arise due to inaccurate cost estimates or unexpected expenses during construction. Surveyors work hard to provide accurate cost estimates before construction begins, taking into account contingencies for potential risks or unforeseen circumstances. This allows for more transparent budgeting and minimizes financial disputes during the project.

Regular Financial Reporting

During the quantity surveying process, quantity surveyors provide regular financial updates, including interim valuations, to keep all parties informed of the financial status of the project. This helps ensure that any potential financial irregularities are identified and resolved in a timely manner, reducing the risk of larger disputes.

Managing Variations and Change Orders

Project scope changes are common, but can cause disputes if not properly managed. Inspectors process variations according to:

• Assessment of the cost implications of design changes.
• Negotiating fair prices for additional work or revised timelines.
• Ensuring that all changes are clearly documented and agreed upon by all parties.

By effectively managing variations, quantity surveyors prevent disputes over additional costs and project delays.

Best Practices for Preventing Disputes in Quantity Surveying

When disputes do arise, quantity surveyors employ several techniques to resolve them efficiently and fairly. These include:

Mediation

Mediation is a non-binding dispute resolution process where a neutral third party (the mediator) helps disputing parties reach a mutual agreement. Quantity surveyors often act as intermediaries because of their detailed understanding of construction contracts and costs. They:

• Facilitate communication between parties.
• Offer professional advice in the field of contractual obligations and financial matters.
• Help both parties reach an amicable settlement without the need for litigation.

Mediation is often the preferred method of dispute resolution because it is quicker and less expensive than formal court proceedings.

Adjudication

Adjudication is a more formal dispute resolution process that is often part of construction contracts. When making a decision, an independent judge will review the evidence from both sides and make a decision that is binding unless challenged in court. Quantity Surveyors play a key role by:

• Providing detailed reports on costs, valuations and contractual obligations.
• Presenting evidence to support your client’s position.
• Ensuring that the juror has all the necessary financial information to make a fair decision.

Adjudication is commonly used in the construction industry as it provides relatively quick resolution of disputes, usually within a set time frame such as 28 days.

Arbitration

Arbitration is a more formal method of dispute resolution where both parties agree to appoint an arbitrator to resolve their dispute. The arbitrator’s decision is usually final and binding. Quantity surveyors assist during arbitration:

• Preparation of detailed documentation on costs and contractual conditions.
• Acting as expert witnesses to provide insight into the financial and contractual aspects of a dispute.
• Representing the financial interests of their clients during the arbitration process.

Although arbitration can take longer than mediation or litigation, it is often preferred for more complex disputes that require a binding decision.

Litigation

In cases where disputes cannot be resolved by other means, litigation may be necessary. Litigation is a formal legal process where disputes are resolved in court. Quantity surveyors assist in litigation:

• Providing expert testimony on project costs, pricing and contract performance.
• Preparing detailed financial documentation to support their client’s case.
• We help legal teams understand the financial and contractual complexities of a dispute.

Litigation is generally a last resort as it can be time consuming and expensive. However, inspectors are essential in ensuring that their clients are fully prepared for legal proceedings if necessary.

Conclusion

Disputes in construction projects are inevitable, but with the involvement of a handy quantity surveyor, they can be effectively managed and resolved. Quantity surveyors not only help prevent disputes through careful contract management, cost control and financial reporting, but also play a vital role in resolving disputes when they arise.

Using methods such as mediation, adjudication, arbitration and litigation, quantity surveyors ensure that disputes are resolved efficiently and fairly, allowing construction projects to move forward without long delays or excessive costs. Whether you’re dealing with a potential dispute or want to prevent future problems, working with a professional surveyor is essential to keeping your construction project afloat.

Build a career in Quantity Surveying! Book a free Demo Here!

Entri providing Quantity Surveyor Course, to assist students for middle and senior management in construction and related industries as well as financial and government institutions.